A supply chain simulation studio for serious design review

Logician is being developed as a workspace for modeling supply chain structures, testing operating assumptions, comparing scenarios, and reviewing tradeoffs before decisions are locked into the field.

Built around scenario logic, not presentation polish

The direction of the product is straightforward: users should be able to model a supply chain design, inspect cost and service behavior, compare alternatives, and make assumptions visible enough to discuss and revise.

Scenario workspace

North America Distribution Review

Network model

Structure, flows, and scenario paths

Review ready

Scenario B

Resilience-biased regional design

Expected cost

$4.8M

Robustness

0.82

Service level

97.4%

Review lens

Assumptions that shape the decision

current
Demand mixBaseline +12%
Supplier postureDual-source
Inventory buffer14 days

Comparison

Cost, risk, and robustness deltas

+0.06
Cost64%
Risk exposure38%
Robustness82%

Scenario set

A

0.71

robustness

B

0.82

robustness

C

0.68

robustness

Core product surfaces

These are the main public-facing capabilities the current product direction is built around. The platform is still in alpha, but the modeling and review language is already becoming clear.

Scenario modeling

Build and revise supply chain designs around facilities, suppliers, transport policies, and operating constraints.

Cost, risk, and service review

Inspect how a scenario changes landed cost, service behavior, disruption exposure, and resilience.

Robustness comparison

Compare alternatives with a consistent structure so tradeoffs are easier to explain and defend.

Review-ready outputs

Present assumptions, scenario deltas, and decision rationale in a format built for discussion and teaching.

What users are reviewing

Logician is aimed at decisions involving network structure, supplier and facility choices, disruption exposure, inventory posture, geography-aware planning, service outcomes, and the tradeoffs between competing design options.

What the outputs should support

The long-term aim is review-ready work: scenario comparisons, geography-aware reasoning, visible assumptions, and outputs that are useful in both business planning discussions and classroom explanation.